PARADIGMA PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA: TINJAUAN TEORITIS DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM PARKTIK PEMBELAJARAN

Dede Irawan, Muhammad Tholib Fadillah Marpaung, Izwita Dewi, Edy Surya

Abstract


Pendidikan matematika menghadapi tantangan kompleks, mulai dari rendahnya hasil belajar hingga kesenjangan akses, yang membutuhkan pendekatan penelitian berparadigma beragam. Artikel ini menganalisis empat paradigma penelitian (positivistik, konstruktivis, pragmatik, dan kritis) serta implikasinya dalam pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian menggunakan metode systematic literature review dengan menganalisis 25 sumber terpilih dari jurnal internasional terindeks. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) setiap paradigma memberikan kontribusi unik, dengan positivistik unggul dalam evaluasi program, konstruktivis dalam pengembangan konsep, pragmatik dalam solusi praktis, dan kritis dalam mengatasi ketidakadilan; (2) integrasi paradigma menghasilkan pendekatan lebih holistik; (3) tantangan utama terletak pada adaptasi paradigma dalam konteks lokal. Temuan ini merekomendasikan pendekatan penelitian pluralistik yang memadukan kekuatan berbagai paradigma untuk meningkatkan relevansi dan dampak penelitian pendidikan matematika.

Keywords


Paradigma penelitian, Pendidikan matematika, Penelitian kualitatif.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asenova, M. (2024). Is theoretical topic-specific research “old fashioned”? An epistemological inquiry about the ontological creativity of Mathematics Education Research. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(4), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-023-00471-z

Asoy, E., Boston, E., Madagmit, I. M., & Bacatan, J. (2022). Manipulatives in Learning Fraction for Improving First-Year Elementary Students’ Understanding. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v2i2.50147

Black, P., & and Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching (pp. xiii, 292). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Braun, V., & and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., & Hwang, S. (2017). Clarifying the Impact of Educational Research on Learning Opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3), 230.

https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.3.0230

Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656615

Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). Analogies from the philosophy and sociology of science for understanding classroom life. Science Education, 75(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750104

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. Practitioners Inquiry. In Teachers College Press. Teachers College Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE.

Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4 (138)), 273–290.

Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Miarka, R., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (2016). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. In P. Ernest, O. Skovsmose, J. P. van Bendegem, M. Bicudo, R. Miarka, L. Kvasz, & R. Moeller (Eds.), The Philosophy of Mathematics Education (pp. 1–26). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40569-8_1

Gates, P. (2020). Equity and Access in Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 279–283). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_58

Goos, M. (2016). Challenges and Opportunities in Teaching Mathematics. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 72(4), 34–38.

Gravemeijer, K. P. E., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (pp. 45–85). Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The Sociopolitical Turn in Mathematics Education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037

Gutiérrez, R., Kokka, K., & Myers, M. (2024). Political Conocimiento in Teaching Mathematics: Mathematics teacher candidates enacting their ethical identities. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(5), 755–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-024-09627-5

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning (1st edition). Routledge.

Hiebert, J., & Others, A. (1997). Making Sense: Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Understanding. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller ,John, & and Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Lerman, S. (2014). Mapping the Effects of Policy on Mathematics Teacher Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9423-9

Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Murphy, R. F., & Mason, C. A. (2016). Online Mathematics Homework Increases Student Achievement. AERA Open, 2(4), 2332858416673968. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416673968

Scott, E. E., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2020). Design-Based Research: A Methodology to Extend and Enrich Biology Education Research. CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0245

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing (pp. xxiii, 324). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944

Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205

Skovsmose, O. (2020). Critical Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 154–159). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_34

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Thompson, P. W. (1992). Notations, conventions, and constraints: Contributions to effective uses of concrete materials in elementary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/749497

Valero, P. (2004). Socio-political Perspectives on Mathematics Education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the Socio-Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education: Issues of Power in Theory and Methodology (pp. 5–23). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_2

von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc.

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED381352

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Widjaja, W., Dolk, M., & Fauzan, A. (2010). The Role of Contexts and Teacher’s Questioning to Enhance Students’ Thinking. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10/dec2010vol2/wanty(168-186).pdf


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2 times
PDF – 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Dede Irawan, Muhammad Tholib Fadillah Marpaung, Izwita Dewi, Edy Surya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Prosiding Universitas Dharmawangsa Terindex pada:

PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL DAN INTERNASIONAL PUBLISHED BY :

UPT. Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah
UNIVERSITAS DHARMAWANGSA

Alamat : Jl. K. L. Yos Sudarso No. 224 Medan
Kontak : Tel. 061 6635682 - 6613783  Fax. 061 6615190
Surat Elektronik : ppi@dharmawangsa.ac.id

 

 Creative Commons License

Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Internasional By Universitas Dharmawangsa is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://proceeding.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/PSND/index